No Gravatar

Security expert Bruce Schneier is very fond of saying that humans are terribly bad at risk assessment.
We fear strangers harming us or our children, when statistically more than 80% of crimes against children are committed by people well known to the family, 60% by relatives.
We fear air crashes and freak out about them – but we drive without a worry, despite car crashes being far more common and killing far more people every day. We put ourselves through ridiculous rituals at airports hoping they will make us safer (they don’t) – while we happily have “one for the road” without realizing the threat to ourselves and innocent bystanders.

Now Bruce mostly talks about this to point out it’s impact on causing us to make bad security decisions – we try to protect ourselves against unrealistic threats, while ignoring the obvious, but I want to focus on another aspect of it, and a bad exploitation thereof.

Humans being so bad at risk assessment has the direct impact of imbuing us with a huge load of completely irrational fears. This fear is directly responsible for more harm and suffering than practically any other single cause. We do more harm to others out of fear, than we do out of greed, jealousy and hatred combined – and more often than not, we justify greed, jealousy and hatred with fear.
Everything from homophobia to racism comes down, when you really think about it – to fear, irrational, misplaced fear of nothing. Fear lets us give up our vital civil liberties to governments, while we ignore the risk that a life without those liberties represents (who is more likely to put you in a small cell for the rest of your life for no reason – your own government with too much power, or kidnapper-terrorists from far, far away ?)

Which all, is just the prelude to what this post is actually about: marketing.
Marketing at it’s most evil. You see advertisers study human responses and look for traits that are wide enough to be able to cash in on and sell. If you listen to the radio or watch television you will see that the vast majority of advertisements follow one of the following few recipes:

1) Promisses: this is the oldest type of advertisement, it just basically tells you what the product can do – and why that’s good. Assuming the promisses are not exagerated too much, it’s basically harmless. It is also, rapidly, becoming the rarest kind of ad, and is usually the most boring and badly written, it’s the recipe used by companies that in fifty years of advertising haven’t changed their recipe – ever. Washing powder manufacturers, I’m talking to you.

2) Humor: this kind of ad actually says very little about the product or company, except maybe to mention some pricing or something, it makes a (hopefully funny) joke. It attempts to entertain you, cheer you up and mention the advertising info along the way. I kind of like this style, it acknowledges that advertising is irritating and boring – and makes up for it by masking it with something fun and entertaining. We tend to like companies that have such adds, and the more they push the envelope the more we like them. Nandos are masters at this kind of advertising.

3) Fear: And this is most of the rest of the advertising world. These guys have learned that if you try to sell what a product can do… you need to deliver… so you can’t oversell too much, makes it hard to be compelling – but there is an easier way – rather than promise what will happen, promise what won’t. If you buy the product, you will be safe from threat X. Since there is no way of knowing whether threat X would have happened anyway, nobody can really say how likely it was in the first place so nobody knows how well your product does or does not work. If the threat happens anyway, you blame it easily on misuse of the product, or circumstances beyond your control. After all, you can only reduce the threat – not remove it. This is the kind I want to write about.

Practically every toothpaste ad is in this category, they don’t say “our toothpaste is good because it does X, Y and Z” (much) most of the add is filled with the very subtle but clear message: “If you have bad teeth, you won’t get laid”. Car companies use the same line “if you don’t drive a Porsche, you won’t get laid”. It’s hard to promise that you will get laid if you do – but easy to promise that you won’t if you don’t. If sex sells, threatening to take it away sells twice as much.
Pimple creams use the exact same tack (and they never even work). It’s not limited to sex either, the television is filled with ads offering some or other new anti-germ protection. If we bought them all, we’d live in a world more sterile than a good hospital !
It makes sense to keep a hospital sterile, the area is filled with people already infected with bad diseases. But any doctor will tell you that keeping a home sterile is a very bad idea. It removes the small amount of contact we need to maintain and develop our immune systems, and what’s worse: it kills of the good germs that we need to be healthy in the first place ! “You may not see germs… but they are everywhere” intones one ad for an antibacterial soap… never does it mention “and most of them are completely benign, and of the small bit that’s left, all but a tiny minority is actually vital to your survival, but there’s one or two that can make you sick.”

Fear… uncertainty… pumped into us with every advertisement, fueling our fear of the dark people we are convinced want to rob and murder us then cashing in on our panic stricken states to make us buy stuff that, if anything, is harmful to protect ourselves against bullshit threats that never existed in the first place. And we never feel safe enough. No matter how many of these products we buy – there will always be another manufactured, irrational threat. They keep us scared, because while we are scared we keep buying – and they never care for the price that society is paying.

A society full of really scared people, becomes a violent, impoverished society. Each new irrational fear feeds on an strengthens the others, and we make the wrong choices in trying to defend ourselves. We avoid people who look different, people who love different, people who listen to different music.

And when horrible things happen anyway (and that’s pretty rare, if it was common, it wouldn’t be news) we don’t ever blame the person who did it. It never occurs to us that maybe, this person was just a horrible person who did a horrible thing – if we admit that, we’d have to face the greatest fear of all: that anybody can do something horrible.
We have to make it a stranger, somebody far away or at least different looking, who does the horrible things. That way, we have something to fight against. If we admit the truth, that our own sons and daughters, our own parents and cousins and nephews and neighbors are no less threatening, then we have to deal with a threat that has no face. It cannot be recognized or guarded against… and we are way too scared to deal with that – even though, it really does happen, almost never.

When we have no choice but to acknowledge it – we find something “other” to blame it on – so we can maintain our illusion of having identified the threat. When a normal Afrikaans kid in a normal Afrikaans school sliced his friend up with a sword a few months ago – nobody asked why a 16-year-old kid was allowed to own a war-weapon without having been trained in it’s use. Nobody asked if he was a sociopath.

The kid just said “slipknot made me do it” – and everybody believed him… in fact, everybody gave a sigh of relief. Music we don’t understand, with demonic theatrics we don’t get – ugly masks, blame that- because if we do, we got a threat we can recognize and defend against.

Humans are capable of being rational, but it’s probably the trait we exhibit the least. We don’t really think about things, we jump to rash conclusions and act, and that’s at the best of times. When we are shocked, angry and or scared, this trait gets amplified a thousand times over. Our ancient fight-or-flight instincts take over. That’s great if you are in a life-or-death combat situation with a predator – right then, those are you options, run away, or fight – and the only decision to make is which one is most likely to work, and you have to make it as fast as possible. But when dealing with the complex world we live in now… more often than not, neither of those are the right option. What’s worse, going into survival-mode is only sensible if there is something to be afraid of.

When we’re irrationally afraid of nothing, all it does is ruin our social harmony – putting everyone at odds with everyone else – make us act with hatred toward innocent and harmless people (seriously who can be more harmless than the average gay guy ? Yet the vast majority of straight men are still deadly scared of them)…

And then advertisers cash in on those fears ? Make us more afraid so we will go into that irrational flight-or-fight mode and buy stuff without thinking because it makes us feel safer ? In this world, where fear does so much harm – they dare to use it as a selling aid ? Sorry, there is nothing condonable about that. That kind of marketing, is one of the worst scourges in our society, and it’s about time we started to realize that.

  • Aragon

    Geez dude, couldn’t agree more. You’ve hit many nails on the head there, and also touched just the tip of the iceberg.

    As for advertising, keep something in mind. Advertising is a product by and for the monetary system. It serves no tangible purpose to humanity or the earth, and exists only to perpetuate money. In the early 1900s advertising in the USA was very objective. For example, a car would be marketed on the basis of its specifications. In the 1920s that changed rapidly and goods started being marketed on the basis of making the target market feel like they need it. This is why the psychiatric and psychoanalysis industry in the USA is so huge – government and commerce spurred on that growth by creating a big demand for trained psychoanalysts in the 1920s for finding ways of manipulating the public. Back then the term Public Relations did not exist in this context – it was called propaganda, but that word was deemed negative and fell out of use.

    George Carlin said many great things in his life, and one that stands out for me now is, “By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth.” In advertising this is very true. Even outside of advertising people rarely say what they mean. We have not been conditioned to communicate effectively.

    And yes, media has conditioned us into behaving very irrationally in general. It’s all about social control by the wealthy elite and the governments they indirectly own. It’s probably the worst in the USA, a country I believe is more corrupt than all African countries combined! Now a days we spend billions and trillions on wars, laws, and policing in reaction to thousands of deaths. Yet we spend thousands and millions on medical research to avoid billions and trillions of deaths caused by treatable diseases.

    All this madness and irrationality is a symptom of money.

  • http://silentcoder.co.za/id A.J. Venter

    I think you have a very good point, but there is an inconsistency – we’ve had money in some form or another since at least the Mesopotamian civilization, we had in anarchist societies and highly rigid hierarchical ones, we had it in empires that lasted a thousand years and tribes that died out after a hundred.

    We didn’t have this kind of culture of fear until the twentieth century – it’s like has never existed before. I think it started in the industrial revolution (which was the beginning of mass urbanization on a scale never seen before) but it certainly reached an unprecedented level during the previous century and has only gone upward ever since.

    The questions to ask are, what has changed. Greed and the gap between rich and poor hasn’t – that’s always been there (though post industrial it’s certainly widened – starvation was rare before then). We did take the reification of a metaphor that is money to a whole new level, out the other side in fact – so now we deal with it as a real thing, or an imaginary thing and switch almost subconsciously between them – this is a new thing, a result of new kinds of credit and futures-trading, stock markets and other similar trades in imaginary goods.

    I think those certainly aggravated things – but ultimately the number one change: mass communications. Never before has anybody been able to send a message so fast and efficiently to so many people.
    Fear makes us buy, and they have found the vehicles to keep everyone afraid, all the time.

    The internet is an interesting medium because it’s multiway however, for the first time- we can talk back just as loudly … the question is – how long until we can be heard over the din of the traditional mass-media ? The good news is, that media is rapidly dying out (though it’s putting up quite a fight) – but it’s going to be an interestingly different future.

    It’s up to us if the difference will be a good one or not.

  • Aragon

    Probably the biggest contributing factor is the fractional reserve process that was applied to money in the late 1700s and early 1800s. Before then the concept of inflation and interest didn’t really exist. Now we have people working harder and longer doing pointless or agonising tasks just to keep up with their monetary needs that, because of inflation, are always growing.

    Money is evil in that it creates scarcity. When you have scarcity you have human conflict because everyone is fighting (be it on the battle field or in the board room) for control or ownership of that scarcity.

    The way I see human evolution is an evolution of the balance between slavery and freedom – a battle for the scarcity of labour. Back in the day we did have a form of money, but we also had slaves. Slaves were bought and forced to work. All their owners had to provide was food and shelter to keep them alive. Slaves had very little freedom.

    People think slavery doesn’t exist today, but it’s still as prevalent as ever. The only difference is that money is our new slave master, and the balance toward freedom is slightly better than the previous system.

    Now what these two systems have in common is one thing: human labour. However, we’re at a tipping point in history where human labour and the scarcities that money creates are all pointless because of one thing: technology. Technology is our new slave. Technology does more for humanity than it’s ever done, and it’s doing more and more every day. The car you drive would have been assembled by hand in the early 1900s, but today over 90% of it would have been assembled by machines. This kind of automation is increasing daily, yet it is increasing in a monetary slave system where it is detrimental to human society because they are essentially competing with us.

    And yes, you are right about mass communication. It has enabled many good things for humans, but it’s also enabled money to tighten its grip on society.

    You really need to watch Zeitgeist Addendum.

   

Socialist Libertarian

FSF

© 2012 The Blog From Hell Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha