Aug 032009
 
No Gravatar

I have said it before, but not really spelled it out in detail but I think the proliferation of cellphones as the primary method of connectivity in Africa is not, as many have proposed, a cheap and practical solution to bridging the digital divide, on the contrary, it’s a very good way to make the rift permanent.

The essential reason is simple, cellphones will never be able to compete with full size devices in terms of capability. Cellular internet remains almost entirely a one-way thing. This is part of why, when a friend recently asked a group of West African African delegates to a conference how many of then visited facebook, almost every hand went up. When asked how many of them blogged, almost none did.

The single biggest issue in the digital divide today is not getting African’s access to content – it’s getting African created content accessible. Cellphones are extremely bad for this. Sure you could record a video or a song on a phone, but the quality is always going to be second rate. You can just about use this method to get news stories out… it’s never going to work for publishing a new song.

In Europe and the USA the biggest debates going on right now is those who see the benefit of the multiway internet arguing with those who are trying to preserve old business models that simply don’t work anymore. Newspapers, software companies,  film and music distribution being the worst offenders. Instead of recognizing that in world where everybody can produce high quality content – supply and demand dictates that since the supply is now nearing infinity, the price must in turn approach zero – and learning how to find new ways of generating revenue, they are trying to maintain their status quo by lobbying for ever more oppressive copyright laws.

My views on this battle is well known, but the point of my current post is that it isn’t happening in Africa. ASAMI is making a valiant effort to be bastards in South Africa but that’s the entirety of the event to reach this continent. Nobody is lobying the AU to enforce stricter copyright requirements on it’s member countries.
Why ?

Because in Africa the corporations got exactly what they want. A consumer internet. It’s too slow to share anything more meaningfull than tweets and cellphone pix on (so it isn’t a threat to the artificial scarcity model)  too limited to create any competing content and too restrictive to allow any new software or ideas to grow.
It’s one way – from the companies to the users, at premium rates.

The one thing scarier than the thought of possibly losing the internet battle in the developed world (an unlikely reality no matter how hard they lobby because ultimately, the maths just don’t work) … is the thought of never even having the opportunity to fight it in Africa.

It has been said that Africa’s major economic problem is that we lack product refinement capacity, we export raw materials, and then buy them back as usable products at ten times the price. Nigeria is a prime example, the nation with the fourth largest oil reserves on the planet also has the highest petrol price on the planet.

But our internet access is even worse off… now we’re consuming, buying products – and we don’t even get to export raw materials, we’re not competing at all, we’re not even part of the market in the other direction ! Slavery didn’t end two-hundred years ago, it’s just that the slaves are now carrying their chains in their own pockets and don’t need to be shipped anywhere first.

So we don’t get to contribute to the web in any meaningful way, anybody who has tried moblogging knows that anything longer than a paragraph is likely to you hospitalized for RSI in your thumb, so we’re still entirely dependent on media companies for news. We don’t get to download music except from cellphone ringtone suppliers – at premium rates (that actually works out more expensive than the CD’s , or only barely cheaper), we don’t get to watch streaming movies and we most certainly don’t get to use the power of the internet to get our own movies and music to a wider audience.

Who cares about the size of Nigeria’s film industry  ? They will never compete with Hollywood because outside of a few choice film festivals, nobody has ever even seen a Nigerian film. They aren’t in the video-rental stores, they aren’t showing at the theaters – they may as well not exist, the one technology we have that could change this, could make them have the kind of success that has seen numerous independent films from all over the world grow to massive hits online – which ultimately led to real DVD sales etc. and made them financial successes, these ideas aren’t available to us.

Now sure it was an interesting experiment when one South African film maker made a full length movie shot entirely on cellphones, but he still needed a computer to put it together, and that was a particular artistic expression, it’s hardly the appropriate method for making good quality indy films in general.

I think I’ve made my point, so as usual, I shall end with a pithy summary of this post for the tweep generation: mobile internet isn’t.

  • Aragon

    Yup, it is sad to see how Africa’s poor continue to be exploited daily, although I think in our case most of the blame can rest with government. Just thinking about how much tax money they rake in and seeing how horrific our public health and educational services are makes my blood boil. The amount of squandered money is frightening. What’s one to do?

  • http://silentcoder.co.za silentcoder

    @Aragon it’s true about South Africa, we have an extremely high tax rate and in theory we have a fairly socialist economic system with free healthcare and many public services paid out of tax-money – so that those who cannot afford them as individuals are subsidized by those who can afford them a thousand times over.
    Sorry to those among my American readers who just got a horrified look on your faces, but you are the only country in the entire world where that would not be deemed a good thing.
    In South Africa, our biggest problem lies with service delivery – we’re not living up to the planning. We collect the taxes but then we waste it. In the meantime, the housing for the poor isn’t built. The free healthcare is of such low quality that it’s useless. We outsourced our bus-services in Cape Town and last year – we didn’t pay the bus company, which then stopped running for three weeks – causing massive harm to the entire local economy.

    I think the continuing denial of the government about this problem; their continuing pretense that the protests about service delivery is somehow anything other than a message from the people to their elected officials to do their jobs… it’s going to cause very serious problems in the near future.

    But I wasn’t really thinking about South Africa in this post, we still have a fairly large contingent of computer internet users and as our economy grows that number rises with it. In the rest of Africa, the vast majority of people have either never been online or if they have – it was from a phone. So while I’m not ignorant of our many other challenges, I was just addressing a particular one because the current most popular solution to it is a complete sham.

    In South Africa our picture is a little different and it will still take some time to see what will really emerge. This is partly why we’re the only African country with some copyright-lobbying going on, we actually have enough people using the internet for the corporations to worry.

  • http://www.lepetitnegre.com/ MastaP

    This post sums up everything I experienced back home. The sad part is that the situation has grown on people so much that they consider it normal. I am having a hard time maintaining a blog about African music industry just because people there won’t post news. On the contrary, they expect me to put online media content (music, videos) that was produced there going as far as sending them to me in Europe by plane for me to upload them. Sad sad situation.

  • http://thrillofconfusion.com Daniel

    While I respect that this is what you think, your opinion – and obviously you’re entitled to your opinion – I completely disagree with almost all of it.

    I am sure that you’ll probably disagree with my opinions in turn. And that’s all well and good. People differ. Life goes on.

    However, although you might not *like* mobile Internet in it’s current form, nevertheless mobile Internet is.

  • Pingback: A good read: http://silentcoder.co.za/20… « SwimGeek Micro

  • http://silentcoder.co.za silentcoder

    @Daniel, I take it your comment was supposed to be rather longer ? Since you didn’t actually say what your opinions are …

  • http://www.mainstreamingict.org rob allen

    Unbalanced –
    mobile internet isn’t the Desktop Based Internet – correct
    Desktop based internet can do more than mobile internet – correct
    Therefore Mobile internet is bad for africa?? – incorrect (doesn’t not follow)
    Cellular internet remains almost entirely a one-way thing?? – Mxit???

    Here’s a few of the info points you ignored
    Mobile Internet can do much more than no Internet (or just SMS)
    Mobile Internet can create huge number of opportunities/benefits in developing countries (there are many examples – just look at mobileactive.org)
    African mobile data bandwidth costs are among the lowest in the world (and many african counries allow fairly low out of bundle costs)

    So like most things you can look at it both ways – I believe cellphone based internet has a great potential value to society but I’ll agree that mobile internet isn’t .. (the desktop based internet)

  • Aragon

    I don’t think anyone is trying to discredit mobile internet for what it is, but let’s be logical here – who does mobile internet benefit most? Yes, it benefits the consumer to some degree, but on its own I agree with SC that it benefits the wealthy corporations more. Internet on a cellphone is a convenient augmentation to desktop based internet, but without desktop based internet it keeps the consumer in a restricted play pen where he/she can mostly just consume, and it is the wealthy corporations that benefit from this consumption the greatest. Sure you get MXit, but pretty much everything on MXit has a price tag and by design there’s only so much freedom one has there. With mobile internet you miss out on the vast power that the internet is – global, open, free collaboration. MXit doesn’t let you publish your ideas to the world. Mobile internet can NOT be used for any kind of useful research or learning. I’m not saying mobile internet is a waste of time, I’m just saying (much) more focus needs to be put into uplifting everyone to the point where their mobile internet is a convenient augmentation to their desktop based internet.

  • http://silentcoder.co.za silentcoder

    Aragon – very much agreed there. Somebody asked me on facebook and I answered there but I’ll state it here as well just for clarity. I was not talking about using a cellphone to connect a laptop or a notebook to the net. I was talking about connections from the phones themselves. Mobile connectivity is a very good thing, mobile-phone-internet is not nearly as good.
    I also didn’t mean it has no advantage to the consumer, but that the true power of the internet is simply not available through it – what it is, is useful but it isn’t and cannot be deemed a replacement for the kind of upliftment where ultimately everybody has access to the true power of the net.

    Rob: as for MXIT, that proves my point rather than yours. The only feature it offers that is actually useful to most people is an IM system. The rest is premium rate stuff. The IM system has one thing going for it – it works cheaper than SMS (then again, sending images to the hubble space telescope is byte-for-byte cheaper than sending an SMS). But IM is just one thing the internet allows – and IM from a phone is by definition limited in practise because you can only type realy…sloooooowly on it.
    I had mxit for years, I logged in twice, and never used it… recently they released their pidgin plugin, now I use it… from my computer. I even made a port of the plugin available in the kongoni tree for others.
    Lets see here… what use do I get out of mxit… I use it so I can IM from my computer to people who don’t have computers… yep, that’s pretty much it.

    Ultimately, netbooks (real netbooks, not the mini-laptops that are now trying to be netbooks) with built in 3G modems will be a much better solution to the digital divide. Slow and not big on storage – but they are easy to carry, have long battery life, real screens and real keyboards and are as fully programmable as any other real computer – while not costing much more than the top-range cellphones.

    In the end, both the software and hardware on cellphones are so extremely restricted (nothing happens that somebody, somewhere, isn’t getting rich out of) that what you get on them isn’t the internet. It’s a small amount of basic features that happen to use the internet, the internet – that world-changing link-between-all-people-that-gives-everyone-a-voice doesn’t exist on cellphones. Cellphones don’t give you a voice online… they merely allow you to listen to a highlights package, one that was put together with one goal and one goal only: to make you spend money.

  • http:brendait.blogspot.com Brenda Zulu

    I have used cell phone internet to check what important emails i have recieved which need almost immediate replies.

    In all it only works better when i connect the mobile phone to my lap top. The interface of the mobile phone is still very small.

  • http://silentcoder.co.za silentcoder

    Brenda, I should point out I wasn’t referring to the use of cellphones as a way to get a computer online (e.g. through your laptop) – in fact I’m doing just that right now to type this comment. It is most definitely a technology that has it’s uses. I was referring to the phone as the primary interface to get online with. While cellphones-as-modems have some downsides, they are not in my opinion a bad technology, they can be very useful (if a bit limited).